{"id":8173,"date":"2013-11-10T00:51:36","date_gmt":"2013-11-09T22:51:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.bghaber.org\/bghaber\/?p=8173"},"modified":"2016-09-18T16:07:41","modified_gmt":"2016-09-18T13:07:41","slug":"emsal-karar","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.bghaber.org\/bghaber\/emsal-karar\/","title":{"rendered":"Emsal karar"},"content":{"rendered":"

42. Millet Meclisi\u2019nin 6 Ekim 2013 oturumunda vekiller eski Ba\u015fbakan Boyko Borisov\u2019un 4 y\u0131lda \u00f6zel makam u\u00e7a\u011f\u0131yla yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 144 u\u00e7u\u015fa g\u00f6k y\u00fcz\u00fcnde bile her hizmeti sunan kad\u0131nlardan al\u0131p almad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tart\u0131\u015f\u0131l\u0131rken ve bu arada k\u00fcrs\u00fcye \u00e7\u0131kan eski K\u00fclt\u00fcr Bakan\u0131 Vejdi Ra\u015f\u0131dov H\u00d6H Fahri Ba\u015fkan\u2019\u0131 Ahmet Do\u011fan\u2019a y\u0131llar \u00f6nce Sofya\u2019da i\u015fkembe \u00e7orbas\u0131 ziyafetleri verdi\u011fini anlatmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131rken, Plovdiv (Filibe) \u0130l Mahkemesi hem tarihsel hem de emsal bir karar ald\u0131. <\/span><\/p>\n

\"Ay\u015fe<\/a>
Ay\u015fe Halide \u00dcmitfer<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Tarihsel \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc 100 y\u0131ldan beri Bulgar Mahkemeleri b\u00f6yle bir karar almam\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Emsal, \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc bu karar art\u0131k Bulgaristan\u2019\u0131n di\u011fer mahkemelerde a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olan ve y\u0131llardan beri devam eden M\u00fcsl\u00fcman vak\u0131f m\u00fclkleri, Ba\u015f M\u00fcft\u00fcl\u00fck ve m\u00fcft\u00fcl\u00fckler m\u00fclkleri, ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar, medrese varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 vb. mahkemelere sunularak, m\u00fclklerin ger\u00e7ek sahiplerine geri verilmesi, yani iade karar\u0131 al\u0131nmas\u0131nda esas olmas\u0131 talep edilebilir. Avrupa hukukunda oldu\u011fu gibi Bulgar hukukunda da emsal kararlar ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc \u00f6nemlidir.<\/p>\n

Plovdiv mahkemesinin ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 karar bir ilktir. \u015eu anda Bulgaristan Mahkemelerinde vak\u0131flar\u0131n mal ve m\u00fclklerinin her t\u00fcrden ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n\u0131n iadesi talebiyle a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f 83 dava vard\u0131r. \u00d6rne\u011fin Stara Zagora\u2019da eski camiye ait ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n, K\u00fcstendil kentinde \u201cFatih Camii\u201d vakf\u0131ns\u0131n ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n\u0131n geri verilmesi ve 600 y\u0131la yak\u0131n \u00f6mr\u00fc olan ve hala dimdik ayakta duran bu e\u015fi olmayan tarihi ve mimari eserlerin, camilerin onar\u0131m\u0131 ve hizmete a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 zaman\u0131 gelmi\u015f ve ge\u00e7mi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Plovdiv \u0130l Mahkemesi\u2019nin ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 karar Karlovo \u015fehir merkezinde bulunan ve 1485 y\u0131l\u0131nda in\u015fa edilen \u201cKur\u015fun Camii\u201d nin Plovdiv M\u00fcft\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc\u2019ne ve M\u00fcsl\u00fcmanl\u0131\u011fa geri verilmesini son kararla kesinle\u015ftirmi\u015ftir. Ad\u0131n\u0131, kubbesinin kur\u015fun kapl\u0131 olmas\u0131ndan alan, o d\u00f6nem mimarisinin ender eserlerinden biri olan bu Cami, asl\u0131nda yak\u0131n zamana Karlovo \u015fehrindeki 4 camiden biriydi ve avlusu da dahil etraf\u0131nda 2 d\u00f6n\u00fcm de arazisi vard\u0131r. Bu vak\u0131f m\u00fclk\u00fc 1923 y\u0131l\u0131nda \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan bir tapuya dayan\u0131larak iade edilmektedir.<\/p>\n

1949 senesinde ibadete a\u015f\u0131k olan ve atanm\u0131\u015f imam\u0131 olan Kur\u015fun Camii, daha sonra kapat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. 1964 y\u0131l\u0131nda ise K\u00dcLT\u00dcREL ESER ilan edilen Kur\u015fun Camii, 1976 y\u0131l\u0131nda ise, G\u00dcZEL SANATLAR ESER\u0130 olarak ilan edildi. 1989 y\u0131l\u0131na kadar, m\u00fclkiyet durumu de\u011fi\u015ftirilerek, devlet m\u00fclk\u00fc stat\u00fcs\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131 da sonra ise Belediye M\u00fclk\u00fc olarak g\u00f6sterildi. Ge\u00e7en y\u0131l\u0131n 27 Aral\u0131k g\u00fcn\u00fc Plovdiv M\u00fcft\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc vak\u0131f mal\u0131n\u0131 geri almak i\u00e7in Plovdiv \u0130l Mahkemesi\u2019nde dava a\u00e7t\u0131 ve \u015fimdi nihayet bu dava hay\u0131rl\u0131 bir karar\u0131n\u0131 kamuoyuna duyurdu.<\/p>\n

Kur\u015fun Cami Karlovo \u015fehrindeki ayakta kalan 4 camiden biridir. 1973 y\u0131l\u0131nda Todor Jivkov\u2019un g\u00fcller vadisi incisi olarak bilinen Karlovo \u015fehrine yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir ziyaret esnas\u0131nda, \u201cbir gecede y\u0131k\u0131ls\u0131n\u201d emri vermesiyle yerle bir edilmi\u015f ve yerine \u015fimdi \u015fehir merkezindeki ana meydanda bulunan K\u00fclt\u00fcr Evi, hapar topar y\u0131k\u0131lan camiinin yerine in\u015fa edilmi\u015ftir. Karlovo\u2019nun tam merkezinde bulunan ve bir gecede y\u0131k\u0131lan b\u00fcy\u00fck camiinin ad\u0131 \u201cYALI CAAM\u0130\u201d idi. Bu camide 400 ki\u015fi birden namaz k\u0131labiliyordu ve y\u0131k\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00fcne kadar ibadete a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131.<\/p>\n

Duru\u015fmalarda Karlovo Belediye hukuk\u00e7ular\u0131, Kur\u015fun Camii\u2019nin bir K\u00fclt\u00fcr An\u0131t\u0131 oldu\u011funu \u00f6ne s\u00fcrerek, belediye m\u00fclk\u00fc olarak kalmas\u0131nda ve ger\u00e7ek sahibine iade edilmemesinde \u0131srar etse de, mahkeme heyeti bu gerek\u00e7eleri dikkate almad\u0131. Mahkeme Ba\u015fkan\u0131 m\u00fctalaas\u0131nda, \u201c\u0130ade Etme Yasas\u0131 esas, Kur\u015fun Camii\u2019nin bir K\u00fclt\u00fcr An\u0131t\u0131 oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esinin, m\u00fclk\u00fcne sahip olma hakk\u0131 ile m\u00fclkiyetin iade edilmesi \u00fczerinde hi\u00e7bir etkisi olamaz. \u0130ade etme yasas\u0131n\u0131n y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte oldu\u011fu \u015fimdiki d\u00f6nemde, K\u00fclt\u00fcr An\u0131t\u0131 \u00f6zelli\u011fi olan bir nesne \u00fczerinde ger\u00e7ek sahibinin m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131 olmaz gibi bir s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131rma olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi, b\u00f6yle bir s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131rma K\u00fclt\u00fcr An\u0131tlar\u0131 Yasas\u0131\u2019nda da yoktur Halen ge\u00e7erli olan K\u00fclt\u00fcrel An\u0131tlar Yasas\u0131\u2019nda, k\u00fclt\u00fcrel de\u011ferlerin kamu ve \u00f6zel m\u00fclkiyette ait olabilece\u011fi; devletin, belediyenin, Bulgar Ortadoks Kilisesi\u2019nin, di\u011fer b\u00f6lgesel dinlerin, ayr\u0131ca da fiziksel ve t\u00fczel ki\u015filerin m\u00fclk\u00fcnde olabilece\u011fi \u00f6zel olarak \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.\u201d dedi. Gerek\u00e7eli mahkeme karar\u0131nda ise, \u201cDaha \u00f6nce K\u00fclt\u00fcr An\u0131t\u0131\u201d ilan edilmi\u015f olan bir m\u00fclk\u00fcn, M\u00fclklerin \u0130adesi Yasas\u0131na g\u00f6re ger\u00e7ek sahibine geri verilmesine engel olan herhangi bir hukuk h\u00fckm\u00fc yoktur.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u00d6nemle belirtilmesi gereken bir husus da, 1923 y\u0131l\u0131nda tesis edilen TAPUDA Karlovo camilerinin d\u00f6rd\u00fc de yer alm\u0131\u015f ve b\u00fct\u00fcn vak\u0131f m\u00fclkleri de birer birer kaydedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Bulgaristan\u2019da halen y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte olan Din \u0130\u015fleri Yasas\u0131, M\u00fcft\u00fcl\u00fck ve vak\u0131f m\u00fclklerinin iadesi yolunu geni\u015f olarak a\u00e7maktad\u0131r, fakat \u015fimdiye kadar y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen davalarda bir emsal karar al\u0131namam\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Bulgar kamuoyu, Plovdiv \u0130l Mahkemesi karar\u0131na \u00e7ok tepkili \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015flar yapsa da, M\u00fcsl\u00fcman m\u00fclklerinin iade edilmesine ve onar\u0131larak ibadethane olarak kullan\u0131lmas\u0131na ya da ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n i\u015flenmesine engeller yaratman\u0131n b\u00fcy\u00fck ulusal ve uluslar aras\u0131 sorunlar do\u011furaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tamamen fark\u0131ndad\u0131r.<\/p>\n

BA\u015eKA B\u0130R \u00d6RNEK:
\n\u015eumen\u2019in Mengi\u015fevo k\u00f6y\u00fcnde bundan 450 y\u0131l \u00f6nce in\u015fa edilmi\u015f olan ba\u015fka hi\u00e7bir yerde rastlanmayan ah\u015fap bir mescit onar\u0131ld\u0131. Bu onar\u0131m Bursa\u2019ya ba\u011fl\u0131 Osman Gazi Belediyesi\u2019nin tasarruflar\u0131yla ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti. Hizmete a\u00e7ma ve kutlama \u015feridini Bursa Vali Yard\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131 \u0130smail Ku\u015f ile Osman Gazi Belediye Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Mustafa G\u00fcng\u00f6r kestiler, dualar edildi, temennilerde bulundu. T\u00f6rene b\u00fct\u00fcn k\u00f6y halk\u0131 kat\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n

Bu t\u00f6rende dikkati \u00e7eken \u00f6zellik, Mengi\u015fevo\u2019nun ba\u011fl\u0131 oldu\u011fu V\u0131rb\u0131tsa Beledi Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Merdin Bayram ve \u015eumen B\u00f6lge M\u00fcft\u00fcs\u00fc Mesut Mehmedov\u2019un onar\u0131mdan sonra caminin ibadete a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131\u015f\u0131na ve konuklara ho\u015f geldin demeye gelmemeleri oldu. Nedeni, s\u00f6zde eski camiyi tamir \u00f6deneklerinin \u00d6zg\u00fcrl\u00fck ve Onur Partisi Ba\u015fkan Yard\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131 ve H\u00d6H\u2019ten ayr\u0131lan eski Ba\u015fkan Yard\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131 Kasim Dal taraf\u0131ndan temin edilmi\u015f olmas\u0131d\u0131r. Din meselelerini camii problemlerini Hak ve \u00d6zg\u00fcrl\u00fck Hareketi ile \u00d6zg\u00fcrl\u00fck ve Onur Partisi, Ahmet Do\u011fan ile Kas\u0131m Dal aras\u0131nda sidik yar\u0131\u015f\u0131na kurban edersek, yand\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131z g\u00fcnd\u00fcr. Bu ki\u015filerden her biri her bir hareketleriyle politik sahneye yak\u0131\u015fmad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 halk\u0131n g\u00fcvenini ve oyunu alma yollar\u0131n\u0131, g\u00f6n\u00fcl almas\u0131n\u0131 bilmediklerini her g\u00fcn ispatl\u0131yor.<\/p>\n

Mengi\u015fevolu T\u00fcrk ve Pomaklar, t\u00fcm k\u00f6y halk\u0131 bu geli\u015fmeyi onaylamad\u0131. Ba\u015f M\u00fcft\u00fcl\u00fck ba\u015fta olmak \u00fczere \u0130l M\u00fcft\u00fcl\u00fckleri politik partilerden ve politikadan tamamen uzak kalmak zorundad\u0131r. Dinimizle politika aras\u0131nda ne t\u00fcrden olursa olsun herhangi bir etkile\u015fim olamaz ve olmamal\u0131d\u0131r. Bu y\u00fczden \u015eumen M\u00fcft\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn tavr\u0131 ve hareketi halk aras\u0131nda ciddi ele\u015ftiriye neden olmu\u015f ve konuklar\u0131 da \u015fa\u015f\u0131rtm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. M\u00fcft\u00fcl\u00fckler tarihsel ve dini miras\u0131m\u0131z\u0131n onar\u0131lmas\u0131 ve ibadet hanelerin halka a\u00e7\u0131k olmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamada ayr\u0131m g\u00f6zetemez, politik yada ki\u015fisel tav\u0131r alamaz. Bu gibi hareketlere asla yol verilmemelidir.<\/span><\/p>\n

Reklamlar<\/div>